Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KQCT-LP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:16, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

KQCT-LP

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not have the WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG. PROD was declined. Let'srun (talk) 19:16, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Iowa. Let'srun (talk) 19:16, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: As the creator of this article back in 2006, I can now say that this is an obvious remnant of the much looser inclusion and notability standards of 2006. (Note that I was not the contester of the PROD; I instead seconded it with the same rationale as above.) The contester suggested a redirect or merge to the list of Trinity Broadcasting Network affiliates, but that list only contains current TBN affiliates at the moment (this station was closed in 2010 by TBN and subsequently sold to another company, with seemingly-stillborn plans to relaunch it with different programming, before the license finally lapsed in 2021), so I can't exactly go along with that. (A list of former TBN translators would be much, much larger than the list of current affiliates, so it would need to be a brand-new list if it were to exist at all.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:25, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:59, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not independently notable and no workable WP:ATD identified. ~Kvng (talk) 15:20, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.