Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KKBOX

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of 04:02, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

KKBOX (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Most refs are own refs and one is a 404. One appears to be about copyright infringement and the other a press release. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk   07:14, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments Velella. KKBOX is is widely used in East and Southeast Asia. It is one of the most popular music streaming platform in Asia. Although it may not popular worldwide, it certainly have the ability to compete or even prevail over other big companies like Spotify or Tidel in the Asian market. As the music streaming market in Asia is still growing, the service of KKBOX should not be ignore. So this topic still have its notability. Regarding the problem of referencing, could you please indicate the unsuitable ones as a reference for us to improve our article. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andyhihi123 (talkcontribs) 08:48, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:33, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:33, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:33, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:33, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:33, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.