Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KJSCE Symphony

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —SpacemanSpiff 06:01, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

KJSCE Symphony

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Highly promotional article, part of a walled garden related to the school. Sourcing is organizational; organization does not pass GNG. Drmies (talk) 03:58, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 09:12, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 09:12, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 09:12, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 06:37, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KCVelaga (talk) 12:32, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep as long as the article could be better sourced and rewritten to match Wikipedia's guidelines.TH1980 (talk) 00:36, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I guess Drmies knows that quite well.The AfD process can be quite abolished, if all the articles can be better sourced and rewritten to match Wikipedia's guidelines.∯WBG^converse 07:45, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - TH1980, that goes for every article. It could be rewritten, etc. If there are no sources, if you have no sources, then "keep" is not based on solid evidence, I'm afraid. Drmies (talk) 15:27, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete-I surely agree with TH1980 and would add another criterion of (as long as) sources are written on the topic because it appears that none are yet-existent.And, ain't this G11-able?!∯WBG^converse 07:45, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- If an article is this big, and reasonably decently written, and it has a couple sources or things that look like it, most admins would say "take it to AfD". I think I would have, in this case. Drmies (talk) 15:27, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.