Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KIC 11026764

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of stars in Cygnus. Randykitty (talk) 13:53, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

KIC 11026764[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NASTRO. There is a dedicated study from 2010, but nothing since except group papers. Lithopsian (talk) 20:55, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Lithopsian (talk) 20:55, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: there were a couple of other sources that had information specific to this star. For now, I added them to a "Further reading" section. Praemonitus (talk) 14:37, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 10:13, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Prob delete/merge - according to Cygnus (constellation) there are nearly 100 (possibly nearer 200, I'm not sure how to read the infobox) stars in the constellation. It doesn't appear that there is much information about this star, wouldn't it be better to be in a section of the Cygnus page? JMWt (talk) 10:50, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The appropriate merge target would be List of stars in Cygnus. SevenSpheres (talk) 22:42, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.