Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KGB Archiver

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn. Closing over outstanding delete !vote per WP:IAR. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:41, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

KGB Archiver

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Software that fails WP:GNG. Lacks any in-depth independent coverage.~~ Pcap ping 00:12, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 00:12, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. 2 says you, says two 01:06, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. I found one independent review by Softpedia and another review (translation) on some popular^[1][2] Russian website/magazine^[3]. The author of the Russian article, Yuri Merkulov, seems to work for Mozilla Team Russia. According to mozilla-russia.org, "his technical articles published in print and electronic publications" and he's "written a book called Teach Firefox and Thunderbird"^[4]. — Rankiri (talk) 14:32, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, those reviews seem reasonable coverage. Nom-withdrawn. Pcap ping 07:08, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Week keep: Per Rankiri. Joe Chill (talk) 01:25, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.