Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KEXIT
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 18:18, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
KEXIT[edit]
- KEXIT (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I take it this is a play on the word "Brexit"; article should either be deleted or turned into a redirect. See WP:NEOLOGISM. KDS4444 (talk) 09:30, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:30, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:30, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator and WP:NEOLOGISM. Fails WP:GNG and WP:42.--Ddcm8991 (talk) 18:47, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, wp is not a WP:SOAPBOX. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:59, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Term is not notable for the use it is claimed for. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 05:19, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.