Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KESHER

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus verging on keep. Daniel (talk) 06:18, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

KESHER[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relates to an organisation which became defunct in 2019 and is no longer relevant. Danjones365 (talk) 11:31, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 13:54, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 13:54, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 13:54, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. On June 26, 2018, the nominator unsuccessfully suggested that the article be speedy-deleted. Being defunct is not a reason for deletion. Once notable, always notable. I added some references, but I am not sure that they establish notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 13:59, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep; Checked over the article and referencing; my guess is that there are far more reliable sources out there, but it's hard to find on Google due to the sheer number of synagogues named "Kesher". I'm personally in favor of keeping it for now at least, as it seems to just about meet WP:GNG (though it's a legitimate edge case based on the current sources cited alone) Yitz (talk) 12:39, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I agree with Yitz. It has improvement opprtunity Mommmyy (talk) 19:58, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:07, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:N doesn't expire just because an organization does. Nate • (chatter) 23:12, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.