Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KEGG Cancer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 08:02, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

KEGG Cancer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. LT90001 (talk) 03:01, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete. As written, the article doesn't show notability. If I interpret the revision history comments correctly, the main supporter didn't find any other references, but feels that Kegg Cancer is new and should be kept a while. This sounds like WP:CRYSTAL. However, I'd feel a lot more comfortable if an expert could chime in.--Larry (talk) 03:39, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete already mentioned in the KEGG article. Maybe worth another sentence or two in there. But agree this one is not notable for its own article until there are plenty of other publications that refer to it, and the base KEGG article, currently tagged as a stub, grows too large. Not yet. W Nowicki (talk) 16:59, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to KEGG as a plausible search term. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 07:37, 20 October 2013 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.