Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KDUO-LP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Owen× ☎ 00:02, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

KDUO-LP[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Let'srun (talk) 20:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and California. Let'srun (talk) 20:24, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An 11-year low-power station that only seemed to carry national networks rarely if ever gets the significant coverage we require. Definitely a product of the looser "notability guidelines" we had in 2008; I can't imagine how it could meet 2024's GNG. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:43, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sadly the station just never really got off the ground (especially when Viacom pulled the rug out from out of them and stopped renewing Tres OTA affiliations), and there's not much to be found about it outside regulatory listings of its existence. Nate • (chatter) 00:00, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per all of the above. TH1980 (talk) 02:03, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.