Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K. Narayanan (film editor)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:50, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

K. Narayanan (film editor)[edit]

K. Narayanan (film editor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable film editor who won a non notable award & fails WP:GNG. Celestina007 (talk) 16:30, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:30, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:30, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 16:30, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I'm struggling to assess all of the sources, even with Google translate, but I'm not seeing evidence of passing GNG. And simply on the basis of the content of the article, there doesn't seem to be anything that would amount to notability. No major films or TV series, and a relatively minor award. Hugsyrup 17:47, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - According to WP:Notability, "Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article". Submitted sources of the article are genuine and all from printed media in malayalam language. 'The award' was presented to K. Narayanan about 12 years ago. Now, it is not possible to obtain its original links or sources. Because, the online editions started in Malayalam printed media (Daily & Other) before just 5 or 6 years ago. But, the detail of the award achievement is mentioned in the sources which are included the article. Kaitha Poo Manam (talk) 19:28, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Fails GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:49, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 17:50, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • This article created with WP:Identifying and using independent sources and there are mainly 5 or more independent sources here. These sources are strongly discussing and indicating about Mr. Narayanan and his personal life and his film career. And, WP:Notability (people) says that,if the person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors is considerable for the notability of Wikipedia. Here, Narayanan has enough notability through with many reliable and independent sources. As per this, keep this article here. Kaitha Poo Manam (talk) 08:48, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:GNG as per nom. Abishe (talk) 17:47, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:27, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • WP:Notability underlined that, "Determining notability does not necessarily depend on things such as fame, importance, or popularity..." This article follows Basic criteria with WP:Notability (people). Basic criteria says that "People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject." And, Basic criteria also says that, "People who meet the basic criteria may be considered notable without meeting the additional criteria below."Kaitha Poo Manam (talk) 18:02, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • If follows Basic criteria about an article For people, doesn't matter Additional criteria of WP:Notability (people) for a biographical article. So, this criteria, "The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for such an award several times" in Additional criteria, Any biography section is not relevant here. Because, this article is not related with Any biography section. It comes in Creative professionals section. In Creative professionals section, this article follows one criteria, "The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors." Kaitha Poo Manam (talk) 18:23, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • WP:Notability says that "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list" and in Notability is not temporary section of WP:Notability says that "Notability is not temporary; once a topic has been the subject of "significant coverage" in accordance with the general notability guideline, it does not need to have ongoing coverage." Here, Mr. Narayanan has got enough significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources. Kaitha Poo Manam (talk) 18:49, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.