Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K-hole
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep per WP:SNOW. (WP:NAC) flaminglawyerc 03:58, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- K-hole (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This is an unreferenced article that appears to be written by people who have experienced this sensation. Wikipedia is not a place for neologisms. Unless this article can be drastically altered and sourced, it is not the kind of entry that would appear in an encyclopedia. LukehWaffles (talk) 21:53, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep -- adequately described in peer-reviewed reliable sources: see [1]. John254 22:30, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per John254 or merge into Ketamine. If kept, should be cleaned up and expanded using some of that scholarly literature. If merged, the physiological effects and cultural references should be separated and put into the appropriate places in the Ketamine article. TheFeds 02:59, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:28, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Ketamine#Psychological effects, which covers the subject adequately. The section on popular culture adds nothing useful. Aymatth2 (talk) 01:32, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as well-sourced per John254. TotientDragooned (talk) 05:36, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Ketamine is too long and full of jargon. This article does a better job of describing the mental effects of this drug. Colonel Warden (talk) 12:42, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- merge to Ketamine, same subject. Colonel, if the style of Ketamine is wrong, it should be fixed, it's still the appropriate name for the article. I personally think the style is appropriate. Sticky Parkin 00:17, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge, fix Ketamine instead. Jo7hs2 (talk) 00:22, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related page because it's another similar article with unencyclopaedic content, uncited original research about Ketamine:
- Ket Avenue (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Sticky Parkin 00:31, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep If K-hole is a neologism, then this a couple of decades ago. Thanks!--Cerejota (talk) 13:22, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.