Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jyothish p jayakumar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Hog Farm _Talk 17:56, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jyothish p jayakumar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional Autobiography of a non notable politician who fails to meet WP:NPOL. Celestina007 (talk) 17:26, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:26, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:26, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 17:26, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I tagged it for speedy deletion at the same moment as Celestina007 nominated it. Does not pass WP:NPOL and not otherwise notable. Mccapra (talk) 17:28, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Doesn't meet WP:NPOL,WP:GNG Padavalam🌂 ► 17:40, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Just tagged the page for speedy delete. Not notable at all. Waddles 🗩 🖉 21:02, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. This really should be speedy deleted but since its been declined let's hope that this just WP:SNOWs. Best, GPL93 (talk) 23:01, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This should've been BLPPROD'd first instead of AfD'd, but whatever. Fails NPOL and GNG. Curbon7 (talk) 01:26, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Curbon7, a prod can be contested by the article creator & more often than not that is always the case so I don’t see the logic in that. Celestina007 (talk) 13:39, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Celestina007, a standard PROD yes, but a BLPPROD cannot be contested until a valid source is added. Curbon7 (talk) 17:12, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Curbon7, thank you for the response. you are expounding on my point, prods or BLPprods can be contested which in summary is my point & what makes prodding the most ineffective deletion process (imho). Celestina007 (talk) 17:49, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails GNG. Behind the moors (talk) 12:27, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This is an open and shut case. He has not won any elections nor had any major post. So clearly fails WP:NPOL. Venkat TL (talk) 13:59, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.