Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juxtapono
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:24, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to be a self-published game, an article that reads like an ad, and some bizarre unrelated references. There is a Conflict of interest too, but that's not a reason for deletion Steve (Stephen) talk 05:44, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as spam. 21 ghits including WP's. No reviews.--killing sparrows 12:13, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- GHITS according to Google, "119 for juxtapono."Juxtapono 05:49, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete I'm concerned about the conflict of interest. The article reads like an advertisement and that is my main reason for deletion. In regards to notability, you can buy one ebay, and it looks legitimate. --Cyrus Andiron 14:17, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The references seem to have nothing to do with the subject at all, there is no assertion of notability, article reads like promotional/spam material, and so on. Arkyan • (talk) 15:24, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOT, lack of relevant sources HornandsoccerTalk 18:08, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- RESPONSE
- (1) All references cited are relevant
- Bennett, Charles E., Latin Grammar (Allyn and Bacon, Chicago, 1908) defines the compound Latin words JUXTA + PONO and describes their meaning
- N. Vincent: "Latin", in The Romance Languages, M. Harris and N. Vincent, eds., (Oxford Univ. Press. 1990), ISBN 0-19-520829-3 Further illustrates the use of Latin terms JUXTA and PONO
- R. C. Bose, S. S. Shrikhande, E. T. Parker, Further Results on the Construction of Mutually Orthogonal Latin Squares and the Falsity of Euler's Conjecture, Canadian Journal of Mathematics, vol. 12 (1960), pp. 189-203. Illustrates the game form of Latin Squares and how it relates to Magic Squares, Numbers Place, Sudoku
- (2) COI: Article is written from a neutral perspective to directly describe and articulate what JUXTAPONO means and what the Juxtapono Board Game is. This article is no more Advertisement form than the articles on Sorry, Scrabble, Chess, Risk, etc.
- (3) Every effort has been made to author and submit the Juxtapono board game article as a representation of facts to describe a unique form of SUDOKU puzzle game and to describe the coined word Juxtapono as a new word in the English language with roots in Latin. Juxtapono 03:16, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- KEEP per WP:NOT, All principles of the neutral point of view (NPOV),Wikipedia policies and Article standards have been followed. If you disagree with this statement, please be more specific in your objections and constructive with your comments to include How to fix and What to change examples. Juxtapono 03:57, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- You seem to be missing the point about citing references. Please read WP:ATT for a more full discussion on the topic, but the problem is that Juxtapono is not mentioned once in a single one of those references. None of them are about the subject, and it remains wholly unattributed. Arkyan • (talk) 06:59, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Hey Juxtapono, see my comments on the points you raise on your talk page.--killing sparrows 16:27, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks, I'll take our discussion off-line to the your talk page to discuss your response in detail.Juxtapono 05:16, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.