Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Samuels

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 09:28, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Justin Samuels

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete per WP:GNG. I also nominated his movie Wine Tasting for deletion. There isn't enough here to establish notability. Sources provided are IMDb, Facebook, and a list of articles written by the subject on a website called OpEdNews - no reliable secondary sources covering the subject. Comatmebro (talk) 17:44, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I've definitely added reliable sources from Hollywood screenwriter John August, and from other Hollywood bloggers. My actions as an activist in 2011 as an Occupy related activist were very notable, as I fought to bring attention to the marginalization of filmmakers/screenwriters of color and that news blew up. Go Into the Story, owned by Franklin Leonard's Black List, also mentioned me, as did many others. I've just added this to an edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nyfilmmaker32 (talk • contribs) 18:40, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The editor that created the article is a connected contributor. reddogsix (talk) 19:42, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:19, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:19, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:19, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not yet notable. Might be someday. DGG ( talk ) 18:55, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notable as last contributor used is ill defined. What is "not yet notable" and what is "notable"? There are third party mentions of the writers work by major media outlets, and by major Hollywood writers/bloggers. If allegedly writer is not notable, then notable should be clearly defined. Writer has passed the wiki's stated definitions of major media mention. It's also completely not fair to try to include independent writers as not notable. I sincerely hope people are not trying to say one must writer studio summer blockbusters to be notable, because that implies you're in the pockets of certain corporations.Nyfilmmaker32 (talk) 20:25, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 12:11, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as not notable. My own Google search didn't find anything else, and the references on the page simply aren't acceptable for establishing notability. --Kbabej (talk) 21:36, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.