Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Robert Young

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 22:25, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Justin Robert Young[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged with notability issue for over 2 years. All sources are primary, no substantial coverage from third-party sources, delete. Otterathome (talk) 13:46, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Mostly self-sourced as it sits, but seemingly a big enough web footprint to indicate the existence of suitable independent sourcing if one digs deeply enough. File me under WP:IAR as a rationale for now (Use Common Sense), but watch for sources to materialize if people take time to hunt... Carrite (talk) 23:15, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 01:39, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone can increase their "web footprint" by making lots of websites, blogs, videos etc. Any chance of digging deep enough for these non-primary sources? As noboby has done so for over 2 years+.--Otterathome (talk) 11:09, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Very weak sources. Skipping the blogs and fan pages, the only thing I can find is mere mentions of his name. No third party resources about him that would support notability. LaMona (talk) 16:01, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:34, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.