Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Brake (journalist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Captain Galaxy (talk) 15:52, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Justin Brake (journalist)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am not necessarily saying that Justin Brake doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards of notability, however most of his notability is based on one event therefore I believe the same should be debated. Therefore I am making a procedural nomination.--User19004 (talk) 00:28, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ProcrasinatingReader (talk) 00:45, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. ProcrasinatingReader (talk) 00:45, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Ideally this info would be at an article listed under the trial name (or even Trial of Justin Brake), but part of the reason for notability is due to there being two simultaneous trials, making that a little hard. Also, having a brief look at articles in the media, they all talk about the cases in terms of Justin Brake, and don't even name the trials formally most of the time. The titles are written in such a way that the readers should be familiar with Brake (and not just the trial), which is evidence that "Justin Brake" is the best location for this info at the moment. --Prosperosity (talk) 07:09, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - There are literally dozens of references, mostly significant, in the article There's no doubt the topic is notable. Perhaps the name of the article should be different, but nothing immediately jumps to mind, and that's a different subject. Nfitz (talk) 03:49, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Nfitz (talk) 04:02, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.