Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jungle Island

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 00:00, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jungle Island

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear particularly noteworthy. The only provided reference is not enough to establish WP:N and nothing in the article itself really indicates what makes it notable. Much of it reads like an advertisement or promo copy. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 03:15, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: non-notable. Fifelfoo (talk) 03:29, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, appears notable. http://news.google.com/news?q=parrot+jungle+island --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 03:47, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable, long-standing attraction (albeit not under the same name nor at the same location). Has been the subject of articles in USA Today, The New York Times, and The Globe and Mail, among others. Mentioned not only in tour books about Miami but about the entire United States. [1] [2] A parrot that was photographed with Winston Churchill when he visited in 1946 is reportedly still alive there. [3] --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:14, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Metropolitan90 --Cedders^tk 09:12, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as deletion is not for cleanup. That said, this article keeps getting filled up with spam, so eyes are needed. Bfigura ^(talk) 19:21, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.