Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jumper (video game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Andre (talk) 21:50, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jumper (video game)[edit]

Non-notable fanmade game, fails WP:SOFTWARE. Andre (talk) 00:45, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fangame. The end. Delete Danny Lilithborne 01:47, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
STRONG KEEP. Not a fangame, assholes.--=='''[[User:E-Magination''' ==]] 12:51, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. -- moe.RON ^{Let's talk | done} 01:57, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. EVula 05:13, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's not a fangame.--=='''[[User:E-Magination''' ==]] 05:49, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Your right, it's not a fangame. It's a non-notable series of freeware games with no sources other than the official site. The Kinslayer 09:28, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Although I like this game, and it's provided me and my friends hours of fun, it's not all that notable. If you're going to make articles on every freeware game that's ever come out, we'd have Wikipedia full of those stupid flash games that you see on websites all the time. SuperDT 13:47, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete- Although the game is interesting,it's non-notable.Dr.khan 18:48, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - This is perfectly notable, and someone tried to delete it before (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jumper!). The result a year ago was no consensus, and the article has been improved since then. --huntersquid <°)))>< ^{Calamari Cove} 16:32, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- But still, no claim of notability has been made in the article. Delete! Marasmusine 00:03, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails verifiability, reliable sources. Wickethewok 19:54, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.