Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jump5

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per notability claims provided, which seem to have convinced people. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:50, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jump5[edit]

Jump5 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability as per WP:MUSIC of any chart entries, national headlining tour or substantial sources. The group disbanded in 2007. Karst (talk) 15:32, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - Page only has one reference and not much else out there establishing notability. Meatsgains (talk) 15:36, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:21, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:21, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:22, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Question: I note all their albums have articles as well. Are you in favour of keeping them? StAnselm (talk) 20:38, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, just - two charting albums, All the Time in the World (Jump5 album) and Accelerate (Jump5 album) not only Top 10 in the Christian charts, but bothered the lower reaches of the Top 200. Dreaming in Color made the Christian charts. This article cluster needs some serious cleaning up, though. But they pass prima facie notability - David Gerard (talk) 20:45, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep When I removed the PROD I suggested that Karst do WP:BEFORE. Here's what I found when I searched Google:
Mainstream press
Specific Christian press
And I have not looked at print material, notably magazine articles. Not impressed. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:09, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Sam Sailor 00:59, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per David Gerard and Walter Görlitz. StAnselm (talk) 09:23, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as the references that have been uncovered during this AfD prove notability. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:35, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jump5&oldid=1143742753"