Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juliette Barnes (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:27, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Juliette Barnes[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This biographical article does not cite any references/sources for verification and does not meet the BLP guidelines for notability. IPadPerson (talk) 19:31, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are confused: this is not a BLP article. Staszek Lem (talk) 20:28, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/redirect whatever is not original research into the parent article, unless there are independent sources which discuss this character in this detail. Staszek Lem (talk) 20:28, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/redirect I originally voted to keep this. But if no further sourcing is going to happen, then I change my mind. — Wylie pedia 08:21, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- User:CAWylie, I have been doing so. Tiller54 (talk) 11:41, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's only been a month since the last AFD, which closed noting that the character was highly notable. There hasn't been much work done to the article yet but I've begun doing so now. Tiller54 (talk) 22:05, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep & Improve as per Tiller54 It's not been barely improved since the last AFD, Anyway It's not perfect but since Tiller's working on it I say keep. -→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 23:17, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, nominator is not aware of what he/she is nominating. This is not BLP. Valoem ^talk ^contrib 22:06, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.