Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julie Eckersley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus, clearly leaning keep.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:21, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Julie Eckersley[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable living person. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:51, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not enough sources, non-notable. FPTI (talk) 01:58, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 02:24, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 02:24, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - She's not very notable yet, so we should delete the page until she becomes more notable or add more content to the page --Pachisu124 (talk) 04:30, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, she comes through as notable. She is a producer as well as actress and very notable in Australia. She is the producer of The Family Law and Glitch for starters. Karl Twist (talk) 12:58, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep just about squeaks through. ukexpat (talk) 20:46, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weakish keep not a glittering career (as yet?) but just enough substance to get it over the line. Has appeared in some TV shows that have been shown in other countries. Eagleash (talk) 12:51, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as producer of two notable Australian tv shows (having wiki articles) as well as acting career passes WP:Creative Atlantic306 (talk) 18:45, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.