Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julian Feifel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SoWhy 12:25, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Julian Feifel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable music producer lacking non-trivial support. reddogsix (talk) 15:43, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:54, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:55, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:55, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep- Julian Feifel apears on many gold and platinum awarded records worldwide as a producer writer musician. His songs and productions have reached international top charts positions. Julian Feifel gets more than 18000 results on Google. I think its a notable and relevant article for Wikipedia Martinfissler (talk) 06:03, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the article about Julian Feifel seems to be relevant for me. There are just a few german producer with worldwide success. I found a wikipedia article of Julian Feifel in German that is existing since 2007. So thats already notable for Wikipedia since 10 years. Jlanzas.089 (talk) 01:48, 8 June 2017 (UTC) Jlanzas.089 (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:52, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete notability is not inherited. Just because the Germans have something doesn't mean it meets notability requirements. Does not have significant coverage in RS needed to meet the GNG. G-hits are not a mesure of notability. (Who resurrected this debunked notion anyway. I remember the furor it caused.) Dlohcierekim (talk) 10:39, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 15:02, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.