Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Zass
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 05:41, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Julia Zass[edit]
- Julia Zass (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Procedural nomination / contested prod. Prodder's concern was: "A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links: (links omitted) Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability." As prodder is an admin, I removed a subsequent CSD A7 tag and am bringing this here. No opinion on the merits. Tim Song (talk) 15:11, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as original prodder. Somehow, I missed this in my watchlist until now, else I would AfD'd this a while ago. This person has only cursory mentions in outside reliable sources and has no extensive filmography, which is not enough to meet the entertainers' notability subguideline or the general notability guideline. NW (Talk) 15:17, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete-per nom and further comments. ttonyb1 (talk) 15:20, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 01:13, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, small-time radio presenter on regional radio, and no other claims to notability as far as I can see. Lankiveil (speak to me) 04:28, 28 August 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.