Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Stent

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Tim Yeo. Stifle (talk) 08:10, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Julia Stent

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think this comes under BLP1E. The subject had a minor political office but is only really notable for being caught up in a political scandal. I doubt anyone remembers her name and the article is linked only from the name of someone else in the same scandal. Sam Blacketer (talk) 20:40, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge or Redirect (as creator) to Tim Yeo or Back to Basics (campaign). A massive event at the time, but it was only one event and there is a privacy implication for a woman who has never been in the public eye since. JASpencer (talk) 20:45, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I do think that the article is a plausible link, search and category member so I don't think a deletion would be good. JASpencer (talk) 20:47, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- Undead Warrior (talk) 21:47, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- Undead Warrior (talk) 21:47, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Tim Yeo. Undead Warrior (talk) 21:52, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This person's name does not appear in Back to Basics (campaign) articles, so a redirect to that would make no sense. A perfect example of WP:BLP1E. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:14, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, but it does appear in Tim Yeo's article. This affair totally derailed his career. JASpencer (talk) 08:15, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Yes this is a perfect BLP1E example. JBsupreme (talk) 05:16, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:13, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge since the Yeo article does not even have citations verifying the affair while Stent's article does. Morbidthoughts (talk) 02:09, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per above. Tcrow777^Talk 08:05, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.