Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Schramm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — Za wl 16:01, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Julia Schramm[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

doesn't meet WP:BIO or WP:POLITICIAN CelenaSkaggs (talk) 10:39, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:25, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:25, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:25, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep Significant coverage, even in the existing reference list. For your information WP:POLITICIAN is a secondary guidance which does not alter WP:GNG. Α Guy into Books™ § (Message) - 14:44, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:19, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

- Comment The only notable thing that is listed is a single news event in multiple sources about her defending copyright to a book WP:BLP1E Other than that she was a member of one political party and then joined another, which fails WP:POLITICIAN. Fails WP:GNG — Preceding unsigned comment added by CelenaSkaggs (talk • contribs) 15:54, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - WP:GNG does not require news on multiple aspects of her life, just "Significant coverage", which there was. Furthermore the English Spiegel link refers to earlier newspaper stories elsewhere covering other aspects of her, which enriches what readers can learn about her from this article, and could be used to expand the article. The topics of piracy, DMCA, and inconsistent politicians are important enough that readers deserve to be able to look up what happened in a general encyclopedia. Deletion efforts can go too far. Numbersinstitute (talk) 19:07, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, notable politician, massive press coverage when she was in the Pirate Party, dozens of sources to show WP:GNG are met at de:Julia Schramm. —Kusma (t·c) 09:26, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Optakeover^(U)(T)(C) 17:36, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.