Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Leonard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:55, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Julia Leonard[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Neither UK local councillors nor defeated parliamentary candidates are considered to be notable per se (see WP:POLITICIAN). No other reasons for notability have been put forward in the article. A Gsearch doesn't offer any grounds to regard this subject as notable. Merge is not an option as there is already an Uxbridge by-election, 1997 page which lists the subject as a candidate. asnac (talk) 07:15, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:51, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Uxbridge by-election, 1997, as per standard practice for parliamentary candidates. The fact that a by-election page exists doesn't rule out a merge automatically, but there doesn't seem t0 be anything notable about the candidate other than the fact she stood in a by-election. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 16:48, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A plain Delete would be even better: failed Parliamentary candidates are inhernetly NN, unless notable for some other reason. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:45, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 01:44, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of notability and I agree that there is not really a good case for redirection either. There are other Julia Leonards and although the subject is listed in the by-election article her participation is almost incidental. --AJHingston (talk) 10:41, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.