Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Horvath

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:17, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Julia Horvath[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO and WP:GNG. This Sydney Morning Herald article is about her pleading guilty for assault. The Cranbourne News source doesn't even mention her. The article in Sunraysia Daily only has a brief mention of her. Studio Tibor source is primary and unreliable. The only source that provides any real independent coverage is this article from the Life & Style section of The Border Mail, a local newspaper which has very limited circulation. I couldn't find any other source to satisfy the notability criteria. Teemu.cod (talk) 12:41, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Teemu.cod (talk) 12:41, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. Teemu.cod (talk) 12:41, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Teemu.cod (talk) 12:41, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Teemu.cod (talk) 12:41, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sexuality and gender and Hungary. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:43, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I tagged this article for notability a couple of days ago as I couldn't see three good sources (edited to add: under either name). Agree with the analysis above. Tacyarg (talk) 14:40, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lacking indepth coverage to meet WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 22:55, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unfortunately I could not find a single RS via Google, Newsbank or the Wikipedia Library. fails GNG. Cabrils (talk) 23:30, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No indication of notability, fails WP:GNG. MickyShy (talk) 17:59, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.