Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jules Boykoff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. j⚛e decker ^talk 15:57, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jules Boykoff[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability as outlined at WP:ACADEMIC. Does not satisfy any of the criteria. Associate prof, wrote some books (might very well be good ones); lots of those out there. Reads a bit like self-promo. Volunteer Marek 07:30, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 October 25. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 07:49, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 16:45, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:28, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - meets WP:GNG with coverage such as Portland Tribune and Milwaukee Journal. Needs improving, not deleting. Giant Snowman 20:16, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per GiantSnowman passes WP:GNG and also this Guardian.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:43, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per GS, seems to be significantly more than just an academic. Might fail WP:ACADEMIC, but plenty out there about the rest of his life to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 15:19, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.