Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juicer (Rifts)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I'm happy to restore the content if someone cares to merge it. Stifle (talk) 08:14, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Juicer (Rifts)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fictional characters in a role-playing game. No independent references to demonstrate notability. The article is mostly plot summary. --Craw-daddy | T | 22:36, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. —--Craw-daddy | T | 22:36, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom, fails WP:N. Chaldor (talk) 23:09, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable. rootology (C)(T) 23:30, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep if a notable class of characters in a notable game. Otherwise, merge. Such material can always be merged, since section of an article does not needs sources for N, just enough for V.DGG (talk) 23:38, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per DGG, or merge and redirect to Rifts (role-playing game) rather than delete. BOZ (talk) 03:51, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect to Rifts (role-playing game). One of the most recognizable character classes in a notable RPG, but doesn't really need its own article. Edward321 (talk) 05:33, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOT#GUIDE; Rifts is notable, but juicers aren't. Percy Snoodle (talk) 12:27, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.