Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juicee News Daily
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 00:27, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Juicee News Daily (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Only claim to notability is breaking two stories quickly. Sorry, but that doesn't cut it, especially without any reliable sources. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 21:19, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Moderate delete If it were formated closer to Wikipedia's standards, I might consider otherwise, but for the most part I don't see anything particularly notable about it. The bigger problem, IMO, is the non-encyclopediac writing in some places, the trivia-type section, what appears to be vandalism, etc. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 21:35, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as WP:HOAX. At first glance I can't find anything via google and the website link on the article goes to a page full of adverts, see [1]. Nk.sheridan Talk 21:47, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Interesting fact; the site doesn't exist now and leads to a linkfarm. As for these claims it broke news? Anyone with novice RSS knowledge can whip up a news site using feeds and get the story from someone else unrelated to them, which seems like what they did to get those scoops all the way from Alabama. As unnotable as our old friend The Post-Chronicle. Nate • (chatter) 22:31, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Article states this website was created by the webmaster for his high school friends. Website is now down and goes to a link farm. Fails WP:WEB by a long shot, how this article survived since 2005 without anyone noticing is anyone's guess. KleenupKrew (talk) 00:28, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:WEB. While this site did once exist as a news aggregator, I can't find any evidence that it broke the stories mentioned in this article or any other nationally reported news, or that it was ever as popular or significant as this article claims. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:07, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.