Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judy Starr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 03:39, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Judy Starr[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable, independent sources, and Google didn't turn up any. Fails the notability guideline for authors. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 22:44, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not meet the general notability guideline. --Inother (talk) 11:34, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Advert for non-notable author. Can't find any evidence of substantial coverage except social media/goodreads/Amazon, etc. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:41, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:25, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:25, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I took a shot at sourcing this article. I failed. She has written 3 childrens's chapter books, but I Can find no coverage more significant than a write-up at Campus Crusade for Christ, the org. she works for.E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:18, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - hopes and prayers do not always get answered. This is a run of the mill writer. Bearian (talk) 01:05, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per other comments —Мандичка^YO 😜 01:30, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Snow delete clearly not a notable author. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 22:52, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
DElete -- unless expanded to show she has done something else. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:21, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Unfortunately, aside from that one link, she has not received any news or equivalent attention. Google News was not helpful at all and a browser search found nothing. SwisterTwister talk 17:06, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG and lacks independent sources.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:49, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.