Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judy Hoffman (artist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Judy Hoffman (artist)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is written like a promotional piece and is sourced almost entirely to WP:PRIMARY sources written by the subject herself. A cursory Google search didn't turn up any substantial secondary coverage, so I'm not sure the subject meets WP:GNG, either. Additionally, the article text is entirely copy-pasted from here—or vice versa. I'm hesitant to say it's a blatant copyvio since this other source may have copied from us. I also notice that the article's creator, User:Artintegrated, appears to be a promotional entity based on the user page, so there may also be COI issues at play. Armadillo pteryx 23:11, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:13, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:13, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:13, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I could not find much for independent sourcing. The Brooklyn Museum 'collection' is actually their library collection, and not the art collection. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 00:48, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article reads promotional to me. I have not found significant coverage. Fails WP:GNG.Less Unless (talk) 13:57, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:51, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom --Devokewater (talk) 11:13, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.