Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jude the Entropic Man

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:02, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jude the Entropic Man[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable comics character. No in-depth coverage and only minor in-universe appearances. Etzedek24 ^{(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record)} 02:17, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 03:04, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Magic-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 03:04, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 03:04, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 03:04, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or merge to List of Marvel Comics characters: J. No need to delete when merge is a valid option. BOZ (talk) 06:03, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to List of Marvel Comics characters: J Dream Focus 19:48, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - this minor character isn't worth including on the list. He's linked from about a dozen non-list articles that provide enough context without the need for an entry at the proposed target. Nothing would be lost by deleting this page. Argento Surfer (talk) 12:46, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - a straightforward fail of GNG - only secondary source provided isn't reliable, and a Google reveals nothing better. Any merge would be required to remove 99% of the info and ultimately be toothless, or inviting to host this entire article on a list page. --Killer Moff (talk) 13:17, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the above commentary as I also do not see the value in a merge. Aoba47 (talk) 21:54, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Merge or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 15:30, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:42, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Namenamenamenamename (talk) 19:46, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.