Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jubilee USA Network (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) MrScorch6200 (talk | ctrb) 23:41, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jubilee USA Network[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources are either the subject's own website, or articles about something else which mention this organization in passing. (This has nothing to do with how strongly I believe in what they are trying to do; WP:ORG trumps my personal beliefs.) Orange Mike | Talk 02:31, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:37, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I just added some material today, hopefully that will help? And I will work to keep improving it. I don't think that the articles are "about something else" and "mention this organization in passing." I think they are about an issue this organization works on and that the fact that this organization was sought after by all of these major outlets for comment is worthy of note. I'll keep improving it. AndrewHanauer (talk) 23:59, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs work + better citations, but I wouldn't delete it. They're a legitimate organization and have gotten a lot of coverage recently in the news. I'll try to contribute to this too. Spectrum-in (talk) 14:20, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 22:01, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - appears to be WP:GNG. VMS Mosaic (talk) 02:59, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - definitely WP:GNG. Some serious work has been done by myself and others to improve this article. It now meets notability and neutrality standards. nbirnbaum1 17:39, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.