Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jubilee Media

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Two votes for keep after nearly two weeks. (non-admin closure). TLA (talk) 06:44, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jubilee Media[edit]

Jubilee Media (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company fails WP:NCORP. CNBC source is mostly about the founder. Tubefilter source is a funding announcement, an interview, and a questionable RS at best. ~ A412 talk! 04:10, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Tubefilter is a good source for YouTube-related content and has a significant usage in that area. The source is clear SIGCOV. CNBC source is mainly about the founder, but it also gives SIGCOV to Jubilee to an extent (after all, Jason is only known for funding Jubilee). There is also SIGCOV in Business Insider and NYT. Skyshiftertalk 05:06, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:07, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Tubefiller and CNBC sources each contribute to the subject meeting the WP:NCORP. NYT article is also usable for notability as well. Let'srun (talk) 21:54, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.