Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jubilee City

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Additional available reviews in USA Today, Reference & Research Book News, Booklist, Kirkus Reviews, and Publishers Weekly. Cirt (talk) 04:25, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Jubilee City

Jubilee City (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This article is about a non-notable autobiography. The article does not assert notability using reliable, third-party sources. VG ☎ 08:48, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

• Comment Well, the book was reviewed in the New York Times Book Review, [1], so it may be notable enough, but it seems to make much more sense to have an article on the clearly notable artist first - we don't. Renaming this article to Joe Andoe and having a section on this autobiography seems the most sensible course.John Z (talk) 00:21, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

• Keep - reviewed by the NY Times establishing notability. The fact that we don't have an article on the artist simply means that we don't but should. -- Whpq (talk) 16:21, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

• Keep. If the New York Times isn't enough for you then this has also been reviewed by USA Today [2] and the San Francisco Chronicle [3], easily getting through WP:BK. Of course we should have an article on Joe Andoe too, but that's no reason to hijack this one. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:52, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.