Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juan Benet (computer scientist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:47, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Juan Benet (computer scientist)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. Currently, being used for spamming. Fails WP:NACADEMIC. Kchdailian (talk) 01:51, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 December 6. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:13, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:19, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:19, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:19, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cryptocurrency-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:20, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not enough coverage - possibly TOOSOON. Apart from the linked 40-under-40 (which is basically worthless as a source), the best I find is a university alumni club bio and a cryptocoin blog about a Twitter argument Benet had. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 02:46, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No meaningful coverage, all are bare mentions or vanity awards like 40-under-40. A breeding ground for link building. The article itself looks like a paid spam. 45.72.215.55 (talk) 19:43, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.