Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jovan Borović

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:46, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jovan Borović

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Assistant referee with no real indication of notability in the article. No real sourcing, just links to Serbian profile pages. AIRcorn (talk) 10:41, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:33, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:33, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:33, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 21:57, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lacks of sources to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:39, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 08:11, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:OUTCOMES. Referees are generally not considered notable. "Staff is staff." Bearian (talk) 21:04, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find anything about referees in WP:OUTCOMES. AIRcorn (talk) 06:23, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of GNG being met Spiderone 22:27, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG. Having not apparently refereed any continental level matches, I would be surprised if this ref had received any coverage beyond the listing of his name in routine match reports. Fenix down (talk) 09:31, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.