Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journalist (Russian magazine)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, (withdrawn by nominator). Non-admin close Sheffield Steel^talk_stalk 15:20, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Journalist (Russian magazine)[edit]

~~Contested speedy, Russian language magazine. No assertion of notability, no context, no sources. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 04:43, 3 April 2008 (UTC)~~[reply]

Withdraw magazine being published since 1914 would qualify as an assertion of notability. Article still needs expansion and some good English language (if possible) snources. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 12:53, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I spent some time trying to establish the existence of this magazine but could not find a single mention. I found a list which seems to be authoritative and recent enough which does not list this magazine. While that may not be proof for non-existence I think the difficulty of finding a source is evidence for not being notable. --Ubardak (talk) 04:59, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm already leaning towards keep even despite the present lack of secondary sources. A magazine founded in 1914 [1] is definitely worth a closer look for sources about them. The founder/first editor-in-chief Vladimir Friche (Frische? Fritsche?) has a ruwiki entry (ru:Фриче, Владимир Максимович) and himself appears to be notable (few GHits, but very high quality ones even in English [2][3]). cab (talk) 05:22, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 05:22, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, I think. GHITS for the man are higher if you use the traditional form "V.M. Friche" or the Russian "Фриче". I found this entry in the Fundamental Digital Library of Russian Literature and Folklore. This appears to account an academic seminar on the journal's history. This commemorated its 90th anniversary. --Dhartung | Talk 08:54, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep sources represent quality over quantity —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rotovia (talk • contribs) 12:27, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.