Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal on Agricultural Engineering

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 21:13, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Journal on Agricultural Engineering[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article about a year old journal. No evidence of meeting WP:JOURNALCRIT or WP:GNG. Created by an editor who has started numerous journal stubs, all linking back to the same website. Notably, the website has a very poor Web of Trust rating due to spam. - Mr X 12:25, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete See other responses of mine to this line of journals. LaMona (talk) 15:23, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence of passing WP:NJournals. See my longer response at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of Physics and Applications. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:31, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:27, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:27, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:27, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:27, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as this is a newly founded journal and appears to not have had even the least coverage yet. SwisterTwister talk 05:28, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.