Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of Innovative Optical Health Sciences

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 23:11, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Journal of Innovative Optical Health Sciences[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This journal was started by World Scientific only in 2008, and is covered by neither Scopus, WoS or any subject indexes. I do not see that it is remotely likely to be notable yet, and there are no sources saying otherwise. it is held in only 10 WorldCat libraries, including some, like Fashion Institute of Technology, that presumably subscribed only because they were offered a package of all of the publishers journals. This is part of an attempt to enter indiscriminately into Wikipedia all journals from that publisher. Several of us have been going through them to remove the ones that are of no possible notability. I sometimes wish we could find some way of saying just that if anyone looks for such titles here, but that is not our job--we're not a reviewing service. DGG ( talk ) 02:43, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, if DGG says it isn't notable, it really must be non-notable. Abductive (reasoning) 03:36, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per DGG. Article creation premature, can be re-created later if the journal becomes notable after all. --Crusio (talk) 03:56, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:21, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- Crusio (talk) 13:33, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. No indications of notability yet. Nsk92 (talk) 13:49, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
delete per DGG. JoshuaZ (talk) 16:50, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.