Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joud el Bayeh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus to delete, after much-extended time for discussion. This cannot be further relisted, and there is no realistic possibility for a consensus for deletion to develop, nor is it implausible that sources will be found with which to improve the article. Closed without prejudice to the initiation of a separate merge proposal, with the caveat that the subject could be merged into the article on the event, and then split out again in the future if additional content is found on the subject. BD2412 T 05:20, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Joud el Bayeh[edit]

Joud el Bayeh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The Ehden massacre is certainly notable, and much of this article is about that event, after the subject”s death, rather than about him. The role of the subject in the lead up to the massacre is his only claim of notability, and I think WP:BLP1E applies to that. Mccapra (talk) 07:46, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 07:46, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 07:46, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, this is jimmy, I am the creator of this article from a while ago, this is a test, can anyone see this? I will be watching this discussion.Jimmypapas (talk) 10:06, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Jimmypapas: yes everyone can see your comment. If you want to explain why you think this subject is notable you can comment below. Mccapra (talk) 14:16, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, thank you. I think a redirect as you’ve suggested would be fine. Mccapra (talk) 10:25, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Go Phightins! 11:29, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 05:40, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep My search also found several references in non-english works. His other language articles have a bit more info. Looks notable to me. VocalIndia (talk) 05:58, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.