Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josie Jones

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Pete Wylie. So Why 07:36, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Josie Jones

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: as non-notable musician. Quis separabit? 23:46, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:48, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:48, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:31, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. She's notable and the article has reliable sources. Diako ^{« Talk »} 08:26, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There's one reliable source, a local newspaper story. She may have been a minor local celeb, but that's not normally enough to meet WP:BIO, especially when she could be covered in the articles on Wylie or Wah. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:19, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- an unremarkable musician; no assertion of notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:00, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

'Keep. She is notable. Or at the most, she links to Pete Wylie.PeterMan844 (talk) 15:37, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —MRD2014 talk contribs 00:19, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Considering the argument that she can be covered in articles about Pete Wylie or Wah!, should the content be merged to one of those articles if consensus is that she does not merit a stand-alone article?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 06:32, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:05, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Redirect to Pete Wylie. Most certainly not notable in her own right. --Lockley (talk) 08:29, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or Redirect to Pete. We can have an RfC to determine which is better. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 17:38, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.