Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josiah Brooks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:32, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Josiah Brooks[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Currently all the sources in the article are primary. In my search I did not find any significant coverage in independent reliable sources. I can not find anything that establishes notability. GB fan 14:02, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A reasonable search for sources for this somewhat promotional BLP finds nothing approaching WP:IRS. As mentioned above, all currently applied sources are connected to the subject. I couldn't find anything independent. BusterD (talk) 14:13, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the above. No evidence of meeting the relevant notability criteria - WP:CREATIVE. AndyTheGrump (talk) 14:38, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:57, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:57, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.