Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Steiner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. and none appears likely with virtually no input. I feel for the subject, but cannot see any way to close this as delete within policy Star Mississippi 01:30, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Joshua Steiner

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability issues since 2012. Article subject requests deletion. VRT Ticket 2022032410007624 Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 17:00, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:32, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The notability tag was inserted in 2012 but I saw that several references from highly reliable sites has been added since then. Jamalahmadpk (talk) 17:37, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:15, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:30, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:31, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There is a NY Times article about his role in Whitewater that is substantially about him, as is the WaPo article that is already a reference. Lamona (talk) 19:06, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I hate to default to no consensus with subject requesting it and possible sourcing. So hoping for more input
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 14:37, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I hope this is appropriate because I'm not an expert on your policies. As you can see from the above thread, I requested that you delete the page. My understanding is that if the committee does not reach a consensus, it's possible to delete the page. I hope you might do so. In the absence of doing so, I hope you might then remove the "notability tag" since you've made a decision that it does merit inclusion on Wikipedia. Thank you for your consideration. Josh Steiner 67.254.226.129 (talk) 17:07, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.