Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Segall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 02:18, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Joshua Segall[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails both WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Coverage in local papers for his two unsuccessful runs for Congress, but nothing before or after or unrelated to those two campaigns.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 22:53, 5 May 2014 (UTC) — alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 22:53, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - it's neutral, reasonably well-written and doesn't cover personal irrelevancies. It doesn't read like an autobiography or a puff-piece. It's exactly the sort of article we would be comfortable with were there more sources and were the subject to pass WP:NPOL. But he doesn't and we generally don't have articles for losing electoral candidates. In this instance, he didn't even make it to the primary during his second run so there isn't even the "major party candidate" notability that some argue should apply. A couple of lines in press here and there isn't enough to substantiate a pass against WP:GNG in my view. Stalwart111 23:55, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:45, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. GoldenRing (talk) 09:01, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.