Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Gagnon
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 00:36, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Joshua Gagnon[edit]
- Joshua Gagnon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of WP:GNG notability that is evident by in-depth coverage of the topic in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. —BarrelProof (talk) 22:57, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —BarrelProof (talk) 23:15, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. —BarrelProof (talk) 23:17, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- Possibly delete -- We ought not to have an article on a founding pastor, where there is no article on his Next Level Church (New England). This may be a large church, and an incipient denomination, but does not seem to ne large enough to be a megachurch yet. There is an article on Next Level Church, Charlotte, North Carolina, which may be unconnected. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:49, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
- Comment: Please also see related discussions at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Joshua Gagnon and Talk:Joshua Gagnon. —BarrelProof (talk) 20:07, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. 4 refs, 2 of which are weak, 2 don't mention him. He led the expansion of a church but its not enough. Szzuk (talk) 19:08, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.