Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Bell (pilgrim)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. St Anselm (talk) 08:40, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Joshua Bell (pilgrim)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reads as puff piece. Highly unsourced, with only source linking to an unavailable video. IrishStephen (talk) 00:30, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. How on earth did this manage to last three years here? It looks autobiographical, too. St Anselm (talk) 00:54, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect to Rock School. It really, REALLY pained me to decline the speedy because he's pretty blatantly non-notable. However the association with the reality show gave him just enough notability to barely squeak by a speedy deletion as far as WP:A7 goes. I can't really see where he would fit any of the speedy guidelines. Maybe, maybe WP:G11, but I'm unsure of that as well. Part of me wishes I would just give this a speedy death via A7, but in good faith I can't delete it as having no assertion to notability and then redirect it to a reality show's article. I've tagged it as a speedy as a promotional article, so if it dies a death that way then so be it. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:22, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.