Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh M. Parker III

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedied A7 by Phantomsteve (A7: Article about a real person, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject (CSDH)). Housekeeping closure. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 15:23, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Josh M. Parker III[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find evidence for this living person. The article is unreferenced and blp prod tags have been removed by the author. The article on his father was deleted as a blatant hoax. Chris857 (talk) 20:42, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:BIO if refs cannot be found. Edison (talk) 21:00, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a hoax. The same editor already this added this name as provably phony information to another article. (It claimed that Josh M. Parker III was the spouse of Janice Rogers Brown; she actually married Allen Brown, who died of cancer, then musician Dewey Parker in 1991.) --Closeapple (talk) 22:27, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: User just created Earlene Jones Parker also. --Closeapple (talk) 22:27, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: User just re-created Josh M. Parker Jr. also. --Closeapple (talk) 23:39, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - Hoax alarm is buzzing. Carrite (talk) 02:26, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.