Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josephine Plehn
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. – bradv🍁 04:45, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Josephine Plehn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NFOOTY Mightytotems (talk) 22:44, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Mightytotems (talk) 22:44, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Mightytotems (talk) 22:44, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:46, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:57, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:57, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 11:27, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per GS. Polyamorph (talk) 16:36, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete agree with GS. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:33, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete does not meet our absurdly broad inclusion criteria for football players.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:09, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Our inclusion criteria for football players are absurdly broad for male players. That they try to delete basically any female player no matter how high-level is the opposite problem. The Drover's Wife (talk) 20:30, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Strong keep. She plays in the top-tier league in Germany. (She has quite a bit of coverage on that basis, too.) That NFOOTY argues for keeping tens of thousands of articles on one-game male players who could not pass GNG in a million years but tries to suggest that top-tier women players aren't notable isn't a problem with the articles or the topics, it's a problem with Wikipedia:WikiProject Football that needs correcting urgently. The Drover's Wife (talk) 20:30, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep She plays in a top tier league (Frauen-Bundesliga). Meets WP:NFOOTY. End of story. And before anyone comes at me with a claim that most female leagues aren't included, that's because of a major failing of every Wikiproject Football member on every level, whose biases on not documenting women's football is atrocious. SilverserenC 05:18, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Playing in a top division does not mean a player meets WP:NFOOTY. The league has to be fully-professional, which the Frauen-Bundesliga is not. Number 57 14:13, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Number 57: And only two women's leagues, only in the US and the UK, count as fully professional? Sounds like a really trash system of notability and a worthless notability guideline. SilverserenC 18:21, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- It is not Wikipedia's fault that only two women's league have attracted sufficient interest to become fully professional. It's like saying that WP:NPOLITICIAN is rubbish because it allows for far more articles on men than women, when the real problem is that far fewer women are elected to parliaments. Number 57 18:26, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Number 57: And only two women's leagues, only in the US and the UK, count as fully professional? Sounds like a really trash system of notability and a worthless notability guideline. SilverserenC 18:21, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Playing in a top division does not mean a player meets WP:NFOOTY. The league has to be fully-professional, which the Frauen-Bundesliga is not. Number 57 14:13, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - fails NFOOTY. --BlameRuiner (talk) 12:28, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- She meets NFOOTY, per Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Women's football task force/Leagues. She plays in a top division league. SilverserenC 23:22, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY, Alex-h (talk) 13:29, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- She meets NFOOTY, per Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Women's football task force/Leagues. She plays in a top division league. SilverserenC 23:22, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NFOOTY failure. Number 57 14:13, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Appears to pass GNG with sources like [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], etc. all of which makes NFOOTY irrelevant. Smartyllama (talk) 19:26, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - Article about semi-pro footballer which doesn't appear to satisfy the GNG. Plehn has only made a handful of appearances in the German top division, and I cannot find significant coverage of her career in online German-language sources (I added the most in-depth coverage from Neue Westfälische to the article, but it's pretty lean). It's the only article Smartyllama cites above that isn't a match report or article that simply drops Plehn's name (but provides no in-depth coverage). I just don't see how the GNG could be met here. Jogurney (talk) 20:17, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.